At around 01:27 on February 18, 2014, the Defendant thought that the Victim E, who was drinking a mixed alcoholic beverage at a “Dju” store located in Franchiscis C, deemed that the Victim E, who was drinking the alcoholic beverage on the side table, was disregarding himself/herself, and he/she collected an empty son who was on his/her table of his/her table, and then laid the back head of the Victim E once by gathering an empty son who was on his/her table, and caused the fluscence to be displayed on the left part of the Victim E.

Then, the Defendant: (a) caused the shoulderer disease that the Victim F cited as a defect that the victim F was trying to refrain from her face to her face; (b) caused the victim G to tear the her face to the face of the victim F; and (c) caused the Victim G to the her face by leaving the empty beer who was on the cover of the defect to prevent the victim F and to protect the victim; and (d) caused the shoulderer’s disease to her face to the right her face.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and put the victim E into the opening of the body of the treatment days, the face to the victim F, and approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim G, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the field and photographs of the upper part of the damaged area;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the defendant had a record of 25 times or more of punishment as a violent crime. In light of the fact that the first victim committed an attack against the victim's face by breaking his/her plaque to the victim without any special reason, the defendant should be punished strictly.

However, the defendant.