However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as a telemater, served in the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea, B from March 2012 to March 2013, and served in E in the Republic of Korea, from April 2013 to May 2013.

The defendant, when the subscriber of the Geum River Broadcasting Co., Ltd. moves to another area within the broadcasting service zone, he would allow the subscriber to be exempted from penalty due to the termination of the contract, using the fact that the penalty for breach of contract is exempted even in the middle of the transfer of the subscriber to another area within the service zone, in order to attract the subscriber, make the subscriber alter a resident registration copy, etc. received from the subscriber, and submit it to the Geum River Broadcasting Co., Ltd.

1. Crimes committed on January 10, 2013;

A. Around January 10, 2013, the Defendant, at the Seoul office located in the Jeonsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), proposed F to be exempted from penalty while soliciting the entry of the Internet, and subsequently, the Defendant, at another person’s resident registration record card held in his possession, changed one copy of the resident registration record card against F in the name of the head of the Seosan-si Special Metropolitan City (U.S. Special Metropolitan City), which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising the said alteration by attaching the phrase “F’s name to the address column of the present address of the F’s resident registration record card,” and exercised the said alteration by facsimile as if the said certified copy was a official document and was actually prepared.

B. The Defendant, at the above time and place, called the victim Geum River Broadcasting Co., Ltd.’s name-free employees, and called his/her director as F, would cancel the cable broadcasting use contract, and accordingly, submitted a certified copy of the altered resident registration record card.

However, in fact, the defendant is not F but F with a view to getting F to be exempted from penalty.