도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "the employee of the defendant violated the restrictions on vehicle operation on the roads front of the business office in the Southern Sea Highway on February 5, 2003 concerning the defendant's duties."
However, since the validity of Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, is invalid under Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Oct. 28, 2010), the Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga14 of the Constitutional Court Act and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, it constitutes a case where it is retroactively lost and is not a crime