When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 14, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant that he was living in the street on the front of the front dong branch of the National Bank, Ulsan-dong Police Station B Zone B located in Ulsan-dong Police Station B, Ulsan-dong, and called “I had been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been called to have been able to have him; (b) in two hands, “I am to have it broken to a police officer; and (c) I am to have a person broken and grow to have been able to have it grow to have been able to have it taken to have him her her her her her face at least three times.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of official duties, and at the same time, up to 10 days of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the B district work site, and to requests for investigation cooperation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that a police officer called out after receiving a report that the defendant might take advantage of the influence of alcohol shall not be deemed to have taken a bath for him or her, and that a crime resulting in an injury by assault shall not be deemed to have been minor.

However, it does not lead to the fact that one-time punishment for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 1998 has no criminal history, the degree of violence has not been excessive, and the mistake is recognized as a member of the ordinary company who attends the workplace and reflects it, and the defendant is ordered by considering the age, occupation, family environment, personality and conduct, circumstances after the crime.