The guilty part shall be reversed.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of perjury is acquitted. The judgment of the court below is acquitted.

A. The Defendant’s misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine as to the guilty portion was made in the course of the Defendant’s misunderstanding of the facts and the Defendant’s misunderstanding of the contents of the report in accordance with L’s instructions, or made a testimony in accordance with his memory, misunderstanding of the purpose of the examination, and false testimony contrary to his memory. However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. The lower court erred by misapprehending

B. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor’s misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine as to the acquittal portion, the Defendant was in the position of a person who is obligated to transfer and register shares of E, etc. among the land of 397 square meters in a divided permanent residence, and was in the position of a person who administers D’s business. The Defendant was aware of the fact

Therefore, although this part of the facts charged against the defendant can be fully recognized, the court below acquitted the defendant. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles as to the guilty portion

A. On October 12, 201, the summary of the facts charged in this part of the facts charged was present at the Daegu District Court in the civil court of the Dong-dong branch of the Daegu District Court in Ansan-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, as a witness of the above case for the registration of transfer of ownership by Plaintiffs D, Defendant E, and five other (hereinafter “Sadong support case”).