2. In full view of all the factors favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that multiple kinds of crimes have been committed annually within the short period of judgment, without any special reason or for minor reasons, assaulting several victims and threatening knife and knife which are dangerous objects, assaulting and threatening police officers in the course of performing their duties, assaulting and threatening police officers in the course of performing their duties, violence crimes including the crime of intimidation carrying the same dangerous objects, etc., which correspond to the lower limit of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court, the lower court’s punishment falls under the lower limit of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable even if considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the lower court did not put any individual damage on the part of individual

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.