beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2016.01.28 2015나51654

진료비 등

Text

1. All incidental appeals by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the appeal by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) unlike the description on June 23, 2011 in the table 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "4" through "1; and (b) unlike the description on the drug description (as for 12 hours, at intervals of 12 hours, 12:54 June 23, 201, 18:00 on June 23, 201, 206:00 on June 24, 2011; and (c) unlike the description on the drug description, it is not sufficient to recognize that the plaintiff hospital's blood response was excessive by the fact that the defendant was taken in the uniform hospital of high school of first instance, the head of Busan University of Busan University of Health, the head of Busan University of Health, Welfare and Health, Assessment and Assessment Service of the first instance on June 24, 2011.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's incidental appeal and the defendant's appeal are dismissed as they are without merit.