2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, and the crime of this case is in relation to the crime of fraud for which the judgment has become final and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the principle of equity in the case of concurrent crimes under Article 39(1) of the Criminal

However, it is not very good that the crime of this case is committed, and even if the defendant had been tried at several times, again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime, and considering the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.