2. The court below determined the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Even if the defendant deposited a total of 600,000 won for the victims of the crime of this case and considering the fact that all of the crimes of this case were attempted, the crime of this case is committed in this case by larceny, etc. (including three times imprisonment) which has the criminal record of five times criminal punishment due to larceny, etc., is about attempted to steals, and it is very poor that the crime is committed, and the crime is likely to be committed, and the victim is also highly poor. The victim B in the investigative agency, "I want to search for things under the Twitter, I am. I am from the investigation agency," and the defendant made a statement that he would be able to obtain himself within his room, and that the defendant exceeded the punishment of this case, as well as the motive and condition of the crime of this case, and that all of the young victims might not be considered to have satisfied the punishment of this case, and that the crime of this case was committed in excess of the age limit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.