A. On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff was treated by the Defendant in a dental hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. On August 13, 2014, while the Plaintiff taken a shoulder part MO at another hospital, the Plaintiff suspended TRI’s shooting due to a flag, and as a result of X-ray photographing, confirmed that there was metal foreign substances in ging.

C. On August 14, 2014, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant confirmed the existence of metal foreign substances in the upper upper gings, and performed removal procedures, and prescribed medicine.

On August 21, 2014, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant provided treatment for the removal of foreign substances, such as the removal of shots.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Gap evidence No. 4 (including paper numbers), Gap evidence No. 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. At the time of the instant procedure, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant left the metal spawning pole in ging.

As a result, the plaintiff was unable to timely conduct the MIM shooting on the shoulder pains, and due to the removal of metal foreign substances, the plaintiff had to suffer from extreme pain.

Therefore, the defendant should pay 30,000,000 won and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

B. In full view of the above facts, as seen in the above basic facts, the Plaintiff had undergone the instant procedure from the Defendant on May 12, 2014, and discovered metal foreign substances in the upper gings that have been generated thereafter, and the Defendant, without any particular objection, performed the removal of metal foreign substances to the Plaintiff on August 14, 2014, and there are no other circumstances that may contain metal foreign substances into the Plaintiff’s ging of the Plaintiff’s ging of metal. In full view of the fact that in the process of generating the Plaintiff’s ginging of gingles at the time of the instant procedure, the metal gings were left in the Plaintiff’s ging of gings, and that the gings were left in the Plaintiff’s ging, and the Defendant did not confirm it properly.