When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 7, 2018, from around 10:24 to 11:02, the Defendant: (a) at the home of the Defendant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (b) on the ground that, at his mother’s request, the victim C, who produced the Internet homepage, did not comply with the request for revision; and (c) on the other hand, the Defendant was unable to look at the victim C’s cell phone that was in charge of the business of producing, selling, etc. computer programs over 50 times, and did not view

Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the business of producing and selling the victim’s computer program by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning C;

1. The monetary records [cognating force in interference with business¡± refers to any force capable of suppressing or mixing a person's free will, regardless of tangible or intangible, and includes not only violence and intimidation, but also social, economic, political status, and pressure by royalty, etc., and do not require actual suppression of the victim's free will (see Supreme Court Decision 2004Do8477, May 27, 2005). In addition, in the crime of interference with business, the crime of interference with business does not necessarily require the intention of interfering with business or planned interference with business, but it is sufficiently sufficient to recognize or anticipate the possibility or predictability of causing interference with another person's business, and its recognition or prediction is not only conclusive but also conclusive, and it does not require interference with business, but also require interference with business, and it does not necessarily require interference with health (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do477, May 27, 2005).