2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and the total amount of damage is not much high is favorable.

On the other hand, there are many kinds of records that the defendant was punished for the same crime, including punishment, and that the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the crime of larceny and the crime of entering a structure, and the crime of this case was committed again during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence was completed, and that there was no agreement with the victims.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the political party, and in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.