beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.04.10 2013고정161

사기등

Text

Defendant

A A The amount of a fine of KRW 8 million, the amount of a fine of KRW 4 million for Defendant B, the amount of a fine of KRW 3.5 million for Defendant C, and the amount of a fine of KRW 3.5 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On January 18, 2012, the decision became final and conclusive on January 26, 2012, which was sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Western District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court.

H Crimes related to H

1. Defendant A is a trucking transport business entity whose head office is located in Kimcheon-si I and a person who actually operates the said company as an internal director of H&A company.

On January 20, 2004, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced a public announcement of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, which prohibits the new supply of a truck, in principle, as the trucking transport business is converted from the registration system to the permission system, and exceptionally permits a new supply only for a truck for special-use use, so that the increase in the number of trucks can be permitted, and eventually, the increase in the number of trucks has been prohibited since that time.

As such, the Defendant, in mind of the foregoing statutory limitation, forged the notification of the repair of a truck for special use, issued by the truck truck association with the content that, after undergoing a simplified examination process of the trucking transport business association, he/she submitted a notification of the repair of the chassis (referring to replacement of a truck) issued by the said association to the department in charge of Si/Gun and submitted a report of the replacement of a truck to the department in charge of Si/Gun, and then the replacement or scrapping of a truck for special use, which is permitted to be supplied in the form of issuance of a new registration number plate at the vehicle registration office, is allowed. In addition, the Defendant forged the notification of the repair of the replacement or scrapping of a truck for special use, issued by the trucking transport business association with the content that, “a truck for special use, the supply of which is permitted, shall be scrapped, and a truck for general use