If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On February 11, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim C’s “D convenience store” operated by the victim C in the Northern-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (b) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was neglected; (c) the Defendant took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was neglected; and (d) the Defendant stolen the Defendant with 1 Byung a week equivalent to KRW 7,000

2. On March 11, 2016, at the above convenience store around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was neglected; and (b) took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was stored in the air conditioners, the Defendant stolen the Defendant with 1 bottled the amount equivalent to KRW 7,000 in the market price of 7,00.

3. On March 12, 2016, at the above convenience store around 05:50 on March 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was neglected; and (b) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was stored in the air conditioners, the Defendant stolen the Defendant with 1 Byung a week equivalent to KRW 7,000.

4. On March 15, 2016, at the above convenience store around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was neglected; and (b) took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was stored in the air conditioners, the Defendant stolen the Defendant with 1 bottled a week equivalent to KRW 7,000 in the market price.

5. On March 16, 2016, at the above convenience store around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was neglected; and (b) took advantage of the gap in which surveillance was stored in the air conditioners, the Defendant stolen the Defendant with 1 bottled the amount of KRW 7,000 in the market price of KRW 7,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off the scenes and CCTV closures;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has committed larceny repeatedly over several times.

There are many criminal records of the same kind, and some of the crimes have been committed during the trial of the same kind of crime.

There is no reason to make efforts to recover damage.

However, the amount of the damage of this case is significant

shall not be deemed to exist.

The defendant recognizes his wrong and reflects his wrong.

The intention is to stop drinking, which can be the cause of crime, is to stop drinking.

(b) it;