However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants are those who work for daily work at the site of the F building repair work in E in the strike-si.

1. On July 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on July 22, 2013, the studio 4:303, where the name of G located is unknown; (b) on the back of the victim’s face due to drinking, and (c) on the back of the industrial knife (9cm length) of the dangerous industrial knife, the Defendant sent the knife to the victim two weeks of treatment.

2. While Defendant B was in a dispute with the victim A (the age of 46) at the above date, time, place, and the victim met the assault as described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by taking the part of the victim’s knife of the industrial knife ( approximately 9cm in length), which is an article dangerous in the industrial knife knife knife of the industrial knife on the new knife, in which the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical records, medical examinations, and medical certificates of injury;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for a suspended sentence;