공사대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 529,106,019 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from September 9, 2015 to January 28, 2016.
1. According to the purport of Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1 through 4, Gap evidence 3-1-3, Gap evidence 4-5, and the whole pleadings as to the cause of the claim, according to the purport of Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-1-3, Gap evidence 3-1-3, Gap evidence 4, and 5, the plaintiff's obligation to pay 60% of the construction cost to the plaintiff for 60% of the construction cost, 654,830,000 (including value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply), 2. The defendant's obligation to pay 90% of the construction cost, 91,300,300, 3000, 300, 2000, 300, 2015, 300, 60, 60, 206, 30, 2015, 30, 30, 303, 4, 7, 100.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.