When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 1, 2015, the Defendant sold the phone to the victim B with “if there exists any remaining rice straw.”

When receiving rice straw, it is expected to pay the price immediately.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any particular assets at that time, and even if he sold rice straw with the delivery from the injured party, he thought that he would be used to repay obligations to other creditors, so that he did not have the intent or ability to pay the rice straw price as agreed by the victim.

As can be seen, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim on July 3, 2015 to July 4, 2015 the total market value of KRW 9,984,00,00, including 128 rice straw (45,00 per unit) and 88 rice straw (48,000 per unit).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;