대여금
1. The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from March 9, 2016 to the date of full payment.
If the purport of the entire pleading is added to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, the fact that on June 23, 2011, the plaintiff paid KRW 100,000 to the defendant, and on the same day, he received promissory notes (amount: KRW 100,000,000, and date for payment: KRW 100,000) jointly issued with the defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "non-party Co., Ltd.") who holds office as the representative director from the defendant, and on February 9, 2012, the plaintiff was entrusted by the defendant and non-party Co., Ltd. to a law firm register by a notary public upon delegation from the defendant and non-party Co., Ltd. on February 9, 2012, the fact that a notarial deed was prepared to the effect that the defendant and non-party Co., Ltd. did not raise any objection even if they immediately
According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to view that the loan that the Plaintiff paid to the Defendant is the prospective repayment of KRW 100,000,000,000, and the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 100,000,000 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from March 9, 2016 to the date of full repayment following the delivery of the instant payment order to the Defendant.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of the reasons.