If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On April 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her business on the ground that he/she is a victim F (n, 22 years old) who is an employee at the E convenience store operated by D located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, on the ground that he/she is running down, “I stroke while working,”

The president, Croper, Crop year, ASEAN, ASEAN without conceptual concept, and the victim expressed D with the phone call to D, thereby obstructing the victim's convenience store business by bringing about about 20 minutes of the victim's convenience store business.

2. At the above date, at the above time and place, the Defendant was asked from H of the position of the G District District to “F to ask for a 1 million won or more” of the victim who was called out after having received a report on his or her behavior as above, and was sexually insultingly insultingly insulting the victim by saying, “I and many unspecified players are heard, I will see the victim “I will see, I will do so, and you will not see it.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to H in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes written in F, D, and I;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the circumstances and contents of the crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are extremely poor and there are many criminal offenses against the Defendant, the Defendant agreed with the victim F.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.