2. Although the Defendant made a confession of the crime in the trial, the Defendant committed the crime in this case, such as selling and selling phiphonephones, and the Defendant committed the crime in this case even though he had been previous and several times, even though he had committed the crime in this case. In particular, the Defendant did not find out the opening of the crime, such as selling phiphones at the time when he was released from prison for a year and eight months since he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, and the passage of a year and eight months since he was released from prison, and there seems to be considerable possibility of recidivism in the future. In full view of all the sentencing factors including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However) However, Article 1 and Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure of the fourth 13rd 13rd 786 of the judgment of the court below are clear that the 14th 14th 3rd 13rd 13rd 2013 upper 7886, "Article 25(2) of the former 2013 upper 5457," and "Article 25(4) of the former 2013 upper 786, the 4th 14th 14th 4th 201."