All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. It is true that Defendant posted the same article as written in the facts charged in this case, but the court below found Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case even if Defendant’s illegality was dismissed due to its solely for the public interest because it was for the purpose of slandering the public interest. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles.

B. The lower court’s sentence (2,00,000 won suspended sentence) against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination as to the misapprehension of facts or misapprehension of legal principles

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case was from around 1997, the Defendant was discharged from the position of associate professor as of September 30, 2016 at a school juristic person D Educational Institute E Educational Institute located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and was discharged from the position of associate professor. As such, the said D Educational Institute refused the reappointment of F professor who was in office as a professor of law, thereby going against this, and was working on the Internet homepage to urge F to withdraw the reappointment of the said Educational Institute D Educational Institute and E Educational Institute, while working on the Internet homepage to urge F to withdraw the reappointment, the Defendant was willing to publish the complaints against the victim G, the president of the said Educational Institute D Educational Institute and E Educational Institute.