beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고단2901

공갈미수

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, some of the facts charged are legally adopted and investigated by this court.

The Defendant is a person who purchased liquid materials from the victim C and C and the victim D, or from F, which is the party to the purchase and sell such materials, and engaged in the retail business of old slot craft materials in the Daegu Seogu Seo-gu market.

around August 2011, the Defendant returned stocks to and handled the foregoing “G” due to the difficulties in operating the business of the said “G,” and decided to make a change in the outstanding amount to E or F, one million won per month. However, the Defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount, such as the promise.

Around April 2013, the victim D filed a civil suit against the defendant for the payment of the outstanding amount. On August 19, 2013, the court rendered a compulsory adjustment decision to the effect that "the defendant shall pay the victim KRW 10 million in installments."

Although the defendant raised an objection to the compulsory adjustment decision, on April 3, 2014, the decision against the defendant was rendered and became final and conclusive around that time (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013 Ghana 589392). The defendant filed an objection to the above civil procedure, and the defendant filed a report with the tax office that the company operated by the victims, such as the Bank of Bank Co., Ltd., E or F, has evaded value-added taxes without issuing a tax invoice.

Intimidating the victims and raising money from the victims.

① Around August 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “it would inform the National Tax Service of all the data traded without issuing a tax invoice, which would have been known to K, the representative director of the KJ, the KJ, No. 4 I calendar in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, about KRW 200 million.”

② On August 31, 2013, the Defendant informed the National Tax Service of tax evasion by using the Kakao Stockholm case at the Kakao Stockholm on August 31, 2013.