2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On November 22, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:06, at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, with the Defendant’s report that he had a significant music with the content that he “the music is too satisfy,” was called “the music is too satisfy,” and the Defendant, at the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Police Station Calleged D (45 years of age) with the Defendant’s slope satisfy, and the Defendant, “Isle several satfys now, I reported the satisfy, and who was the reporter.”

"To make a bath theory, and to catch the breath of the above D with his hand, and to walk the above D's bridge on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - None of any criminal record - Other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, health status, home environment, motive, means, consequence, etc.