2. The lower court’s judgment: (a) the victim’s statement from an investigative agency to the lower court’s court stated that: (b) the victim’s statement from the investigative agency to the court below did not seem to have been paid a false damage even in light of the specific and consistent statement attitude; (c) the victim’s statement is credibility in light of the circumstances of the report that male and female is wraped within the drinking house of this case; (c) the victim complained of the victim’s statement from the police officer dispatched on the date of the instant case’s arrival; (d) the victim complained of the receipt of the chest and side glass; and (e) the victim complained of the chest certificate by visiting the new wall G hospital emergency room on July 19, 2015; (e) the police investigation on the same day took an aggregate of the following facts; (e) the victim suffered an injury on the part of the victim, other than the victim’s diagnosis and examination result, and (e) the Defendant continued to receive the victim’s injury on August 10, 2015.

The decision was determined.

3. Examining the above judgment of the court below after comparing it with records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

It does not appear.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.