[criminal power] On June 8, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Suwon District Court on the same day, and a summary order of two million won for the same crime at the same court on July 13, 201, respectively. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime in the same court on the same day, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime. The above judgment on December 8, 2007 became final and conclusive and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

On March 19, 2014, the Defendant, at around 19:55, driven a Dunst vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.070% in the section of about 8km from the house to the new interesting stone of the same military unit, from the house to the new interesting stone of the same military unit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (report attached to judgments, etc.);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the fact that there is a record of being punished several times for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation, the fact that another crime is committed during the period of suspension of execution of the same crime, the fact that the person makes a false statement about the circumstances of the drunk driving and the circumstances, and re-written the statement, and that it is not good to the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is deemed that

The sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments.