1. On October 31, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated “C”, “A”, “E”, “E”, “C”, “C”, and “C” in the name of the applicant column of the settlement account number column in the name of the lender of the site for loan application using a pentle in order to obtain a loan of the loan of Hyundai Capital in the name of the lender of the site for loan application, and affixed C seal next to the name of the applicant.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the loan application, which is a private document in C’s name on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and place, submitted a forged loan application form as if it were a document duly formed, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement related to C, F, and G;

1. Examination table:

1. Copy of the register of automobiles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on loan application, confirmation of provision of credit information related to debts, and information inside and outside the examination;

1. Relevant Articles 231, 234, and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;