When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 20, 201, the Defendant was issued KRW 500,00 in cash from the victim, i.e., the victim of the damage, even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to work as the employee of the Jindo-gun, the Defendant did not have the intent or capacity to work as the employee of the Kim-gun, and the Defendant was issued KRW 50,000 in cash from the seat of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, the records, such as the circumstances after the crime, and the criminal records of the Defendant’s same kind of crime, sentencing cases in similar cases, etc., the amount of fine specified in the summary order is not acknowledged to be excessive, and there is no change of circumstances that may be considered after the summary order, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by maintaining the amount of fine under the summary order.