성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강간등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The court below acquitted the defendant about the part of the residential intrusion on the ground that the defendant's perception that he was living against the resident's will is not recognized, and dismissed the public prosecution of this case on the ground that the victim revoked the complaint. The court below erred in the misunderstanding of facts.
2. 이 사건 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2013. 3. 29. 05:50경 고양시 일산동구 D 아파트의 잠겨 있지 않은 출입문을 통하여 피해자의 주거지에 침입한 후, 만취상태로 거실에서 잠을 자느라 항거불능 상태에 있던 피해자를 발견하고 피해자를 강간할 것을 마음먹고 피해자의 입술에 키스를 하고, 피해자의 귀와 목 부분을 혀로 핥고, 피해자의 음부에 손가락을 집어넣은 후 간음하려 하였으나, 위 아파트 복층에서 잠을 자고 있던 피해자의 남편이 깨어나서 피고인을 제압하는 바람에 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.
3. In light of the circumstances acknowledged by the lower court that could have been duly adopted and examined and the process and circumstances leading to the instant crime, the lower court’s determination that “it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant, only the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, was aware that he would go against the intent of the victim from the beginning, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.” Therefore, the Prosecutor’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts is without merit.
4. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.