beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.02.16 2014고단1935

도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months and by a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:10 on May 25, 2014, the Defendant driving a B-picking Vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 1km from the road where it is impossible to identify the Sungsandong Branch of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the private distance from the 1km Road of the same Gu.

2. On May 25, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: (a) around 21:40, at the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Transport Survey Center office, the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Office for Transport Investigation to conceal the unlicensed driving; (b) recorded C’s name and resident registration number in the traffic accident situation report kept at the relevant location; and (c) forged C’s signature in the statement of traffic accident occurrence status, which is a private document concerning the certification of the name of said C, with the intent to exercise the said location; and (d) forged C’s signature in the statement

3. The suspect at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (2) submitted to the police officer in charge of not knowing the forgery as if the written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident under C forged was duly prepared.

4. On May 25, 201, the Defendant entered the name and resident registration number of the Defendant C in order to concealless facts without a license at the office of the traffic survey department of Mapo Police Station, which is the place indicated in paragraph (2), in order to drive without a license, the Defendant entered the name and resident registration number of the Defendant C, and the column of confirmation of the written confirmation of the investigation process in the Mapo Police Station’s office, which is the place indicated in paragraph (2).

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the above C’s signature without authority.

5. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph 4, submitted the forged C’s signature to Da and assistant E, who is aware of the forgery, as if the signature was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

참조조문