The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the crime of receiving, occupational relation, unlawful acquisition intent, and calculation of the received amount under Article 5(4) and (1) of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.