도로법위반
The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.
1. At around 09:30 on August 7, 1993, B, an employee of the Defendant, in violation of the restriction on operation of vehicles with a gross weight of at least 10 tons among at least 40 tons of a 10 tons of a vehicle at the control station of the main motor vehicle at the Young-dong Highway, Dong-dong, Seowon-dong, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, the Gangwon-do Office, operated the Defendant’s vehicle with a gross weight of at least 1.8 tons and 11.5 tons of a 3 stable
2. Determination and conclusion, the effect of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2012Hun-Ga18, Oct. 25, 2012 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged. Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a case not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.