2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A. On November 22, 2010, the Plaintiff lent KRW 10 million to the network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) on November 22, 2010 by issuing one cashier’s check number F, face value 10 million to the National Bank No. 10 million.

B. In addition, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 9.8 million in total to the account of each deceased’s community credit cooperative on December 11, 2012, KRW 5 million on December 12, 201, KRW 4 million on the same month, and KRW 80,000 on December 13, 201, to the account of each deceased’s community credit cooperative.

C. As such, the Plaintiff has a total of KRW 19.8 million loan claims against the Deceased. As such, the Defendants, the inheritor of the Deceased, are obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money claimed in accordance with their respective inheritance shares.

2. In full view of the reasoning of the judgment of the court below as to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the entire argument as to the order to submit financial transaction information to the president of the North Korean Saemaul Depository of the first instance court, the plaintiff may recognize the defendants' transfer of the sum of KRW 5 million to the account of the deceased's community credit cooperatives in the name of the deceased on December 11, 2012, KRW 4 million on December 12, 2012, KRW 9.8 million on the 13th of the same month, and KRW 9.8 million on the 15 million on the 10th of the same month. However, as to whether the plaintiff extended the above KRW 9.8 million to the deceased on November 2010, the plaintiff did not recognize the above evidence Nos. 1, 6-1, 2, 9-1, 10-1, 10-1, 17, 13-1, 15-2, and 17 evidence No.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the plaintiff lent KRW 19.8 million to the deceased is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.