beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.03.29 2017고단270

협박

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the chairman of the Busan Southern-gu Council for the Representative of Residents of Apartment B, and the victim C is the managing complaint of the above apartment.

At around 15:15 on September 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s son (name: E) on the ground that the victim’s son (name) was in good reputation with the victim on the ground that the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged as having withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on February 14, 2017. Thus, the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.