However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

1. Defendant B is a person who has a spouse who completed a marriage report with C on August 1, 1995. A.

On February 2, 2008, the Defendant sent to the Seocho-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, with sexual intercourse with A on a single occasion.

B. A around May 2008, the Defendant sent to the studio under the ground of the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon for the first time with the Defendant.

C. On February 2009, the Defendant sent a watch with A and a single sexual intercourse at the above underground room room in the middle of the 2009.

2. Defendant A knew of the fact that he is a spouse B, the Defendant had sexual intercourses with B and three times at each time, place, and place described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on family relation certificate;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the first crime committed by the defendant A, and the defendants repent in depth and reflect their mistakes) of the suspended execution.