2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On November 16, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased and used “D” from Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”), and began to use the hot water boiler (hereinafter “the instant hot water boiler”), which was delivered to Defendant C on December 2014, when the hot water boiler (E) was overheated from the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics.

B. On the other hand, the instant Onnuri Telecommunication consisting of a stove and stove, which connects hot boiler and tettoves with hot boiler and tettoves, and Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) manufactured and sold a hot boiler to Defendant C, and Defendant C manufactured and sold a hot-water finished product, combining the hot-water boiler and ttoves purchased from F.

C. On May 28, 2015, at around 13:00, the Plaintiff operated the instant hot water boiler, and locked the instant hot water boiler to the bed, and suffered pictures from the front part of his left part and the front part of the instant hot water boiler around 17:00, at around 17:00, when 13:00, the Plaintiff divingd the instant hot water boiler to the bed.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Since then, on May 28, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in G Hospital and received video treatment on June 13, 2015, and was discharged on June 13, 2015, but again, was hospitalized in H outside the hospital on June 16, 2015, and was discharged on the following day.

[Reasons for Recognition] No. 4, Gap's evidence No. 5, Gap's evidence No. 6, Gap's evidence No. 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff, a consumer of the gist of the plaintiff's assertion, purchased the instant hot water set and used it normally at his own house (at the time, the temperature of the hot water boiler was set at 32:33 cc.), and the video was put in the area where the manufacturer's exclusive control was applied, and the accident of this case occurred.