2. The judgment of the court below acknowledged all of the crimes of this case. However, since the defendant operated a motor vehicle which was not obligated to obtain a license without a license and escaped at the site, the case is not less than that of the defendant, since the vehicle involved in this case is so-called "large-scale vehicle," the defendant is considered to have escaped without taking any follow-up measures to the investigation agency on the ground that the defendant could avoid tracking on the site of the accident; the defendant did not agree with the victim up to the trial; the defendant was unable to reach an agreement with the victim up to the trial; the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the history of punishment for suspension of execution; the defendant again committed the crime of this case even if he had been punished for the same kind of crime; the defendant has been repeatedly stopped from driving several times since the year 202; there is no change in circumstances to change the punishment of the court below after the sentence of the court below; and the defendant's age, age, family relationship, circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.