However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

On August 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was a person who is engaged in driving of B-si; (b) was driving the cab on the road in front of the Yannam-Eup, Chungcheongnam-si; (c) was driving on the road in front of the Yannam-si apartment located in the front of the Yannam-gu, Yangyang-si; and (d) was driving on the road in front of the Yannam-do, where a signal, etc. is installed in the direction of the settlement of the Yak apartment at the off-nam sports park; (c) the person engaged in driving the vehicle is at a crosswalk where the signal, etc. is installed; and (d) was verified as having the duty of care to reduce the speed and properly look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the road of the pedestrian who is obliged to drive under the new subparagraph; (d) was negligent in the course of business, disregarding the change of the pedestrian signal into green light and caused injury to the victim for about seven weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at the scene of an accident by cutting down a lock of a ice boom box image;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Punishment concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The crime of this case committed by the defendant on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act is committed by the defendant, which led to serious injury to the victim by shocking the victim who dried a crosswalk while driving a taxi. The crime of this case is very high in light of the degree and result of the defendant's breach of duty of care.

However, the defendant appears to have an attitude that the defendant leads to the confession of crime and depth, the vehicle of the defendant is being covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the victim is also the victim.