On February 14, 2014, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu D District Police Station D District Police Station, after receiving a report from a female passenger who is unable to take the body, and reported to the above female passenger; and (b) without any reason, the Defendant expressed that the Defendant “I will come to the police officer, whether I will come to the police officer, whether I will come to go, I will come to go to go, I will go to go back, and I will go to go back, I will go to go back,” and carried out a fat with the left hand.

As a result, violence was committed continuously.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the reasons for sentencing of sentence for sentencing of imprisonment [the decision of punishment] shall be the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties [the special person] mitigated elements: In the case where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, [the decision of the recommended sphere] mitigation area [the scope of punishment] one month to eight months [the decision of the recommended sphere]] mitigation area [the defendant is against the defendant. However, even though the defendant was sentenced two times of fine and one suspended sentence due to the same criminal record, it is inevitable to sentence sentence in that the defendant committed the crime in this case.

Other punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.