The defendant.

A. The Plaintiff is a dentist who has received dental treatment from the Defendant, and the Defendant is a dentist who operates a dental clinic in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

B. On August 7, 2013, the Plaintiff complained of inconvenience from 31 and 41 on the part of the Plaintiff at the Defendant hospital (see, e.g., “www.naver.com”) (see, e.g., “pathic image”). On the part of the Plaintiff, the Defendant, once, tried to sculpate the Plaintiff’s trace of 41 and to provide sculpt-type treatment for three months after 3 months, with the Plaintiff’s consent. 2) After which, on August 10, 2013, the Defendant added the Plaintiff’s 41 puls on the part of the Plaintiff on the 41st day of 2013. On November 27, 2013, 2013.

(3) However, on November 28, 2013, the day following the day on which the above box was planted, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant hospital that the pains of the patriarch have deepened and inconvenienceed. The Defendant issued the above patriarch. On November 30, 2013, the Plaintiff planted the patriarch at the place on which the patriarch was in place (hereinafter “the second patriarch”) (hereinafter “the second patriarch”).

(4) After planting the second sheet, the Plaintiff complained of the pain continued on that part. The Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request, filed a removal of the first sheet for the purpose of administering a brupt on December 14, 2013. On December 23, 2013, the Plaintiff removed the first sheet for the purpose of administering a brupt on the brupt No. 33 to 43.

5) After that, the Defendant continued to provide salt treatment on the part of the Plaintiff’s 31 and 41, and around June 5, 2014, the Plaintiff’s salt was cured (hereinafter “the Defendant’s entire treatment process”).

(i) [In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, entry of No. 3 in the evidence, the results of response to requests for appraisal of medical records to the Korean Dental Association of this Court;