체류기간 연장허가 거부처분 취소
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The lower court, citing the reasoning of the first instance judgment, determined that the Defendant’s disposition of this case, which denied the Plaintiff’s application for extension of the period of stay, was lawful.
Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the Refugee Act or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.