However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal records] On May 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution in the Changwon District Court's Seoul District Court's New District Court's branch office, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. From May 17, 2013 to around 18, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) on the “D Farmwon” operated by the Defendant in Gohap-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) on the sales contract located in the said deaf-gun, the Defendant shall be in colored with the crypology to the contract in the cryp column with the cryp of cryp; (c) Mapo-gu, Changwon-si; (d) Mapo-gu, Changwon-si; (e) Mapo-gu, 30 weeks in the quantity column; (d) Mapo-si; (e) Mapo-si; (e) Mapo-gu, 300,000 in the sale price column; and (e) Ma

F Official sealed the name of F.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the F Contract under the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On May 20, 2013, the Defendant, at the office of “I” for the operation of H located in Gohap-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gohap-gun, the said investigation document, presented the forged transaction agreement to H as if it were a document duly formed.

3. 사기 피고인은 2013. 5. 20. 경 경남 합천군 G에 있는 피해자 H 운영의 ‘I’ 사무실에서 피해자에게 “ 팔만 대장경 세계문화 엑스포 행사장 부근에 있는 중앙 분리대 화단조성 공사를 땄는데, 위 공사를 하려면 나무가 필요하다.

The F entered into a contract for the sale of pine trees with F, and there is no internal sales price. As such, instead of paying KRW 30 million, there is a difference in the payment of KRW 30 million. In the last time, if the construction of the said central subdivision is well-grounded, there is a benefit of KRW 300 million, including the above sales price, thereby making up KRW 100 million.

The phrase " shall be false," and a forged contract shall be presented to the victim as referred to in paragraph (1).

However, the defendant did not have entered into the contract with F, and there was no fact that he entered into the contract with F, and there was no fact that he entered into the contract with F.