2. Determination Doesck, the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, and the benefits acquired through the instant crime are not significant, and the fact that part of the crime was returned is recognized.

On the other hand, however, the Defendant committed the same crime more than six times (four times among them) or more times of criminal punishment for the same crime and committed the same crime repeatedly. As such, the nature of the crime and the circumstances are not good, the sentence of sentence against the Defendant is inevitable. Considering all of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the background of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the circumstances alleged by the Defendant shall be considered.

Even if the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, it is difficult to accept the defendant's argument of unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.