2. On the other hand, the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and the crime of this case is committed again during the suspension of execution, and the quality of such crime is not good.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant is recognized as committing the instant crime and is going against the Defendant’s view that it would not commit such a crime again, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, the lower court’s sentence is deemed unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.