except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

1. On July 25, 2014, around 19:30, the Defendant destroyed one game machine owned by a victim’s name-free winner under the control of E, such as the damage of property and obstruction of business, which was carried out in the game in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, and the second floor, and which was removed from E, the manager of the said game machine.

The Defendant interfered with the operation of the said victim E’s game site by force, which caused approximately 30 minutes of his/her success in the same manner.

2. At around 20:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) 20:10 the same day, at the same place, she saw that “the Defendant was a person who frighting to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright,”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. Investigation report (Investigation into the I telephone of the rayer);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts of victim H, victim E pictures, and property damaged parts;

1. Article 36 of the relevant Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a point of obstructing performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant shall confession and reflect the crime of this case, and shall be the victim E.