2. Considering the fact that the Defendants were committed when committing the crime, and the Defendants were committed against the victim insurance companies, the commission of the crime and the expansion of damage are liable to the extent of the occurrence of the crime, and the Defendants were subject to criminal punishment or criminal punishment exceeding the fine prior to the crime of this case, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendants for a long time after receiving hospital treatment for a long period of more than necessary and the nature of the crime is not good; Defendant A repeated the crime for a considerable period of time; Defendant A repeated the crime for a considerable period of time; Defendant A repeated the crime for a considerable period of time; Defendant A’s amount of the insurance proceeds exceeds KRW 171,559,089; Defendant’s insurance fraud crime of this case requires severe punishment, referring to social harm, such as the transfer of economic damage to many general subscribers; Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and Defendant’s assertion that all of the conditions for sentencing are unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.