토지인도
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant CD leaves the building in the attached list; and
B. The defendant B is the building.
In full view of the facts without dispute and the purport of the entire evidence argument submitted by the Plaintiff, the fact that the Plaintiff acquired ownership of “Land” as indicated in the attached Form on November 3, 2016, Defendant B owned the building “Building” on the land, and Defendant CD owned the building.
Meanwhile, Defendant B asserted that the ownership was transferred for the purpose of transfer in the attached Form “Building” and all of the bonds were repaid and transferred again, but it is not the disposal right holder of the building. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge such assertion.
Thus, the defendant CD shall leave the building in the attached list to the plaintiff, and the defendant Eul shall remove the building, deliver "Land" as stated in the attached list, and return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of 100,000 won per month from November 4, 2016 to the time of delivery of the land.