If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On May 15, 2015, around 04:37, the Defendant: (a) 112, before the restaurant, sent a uniform with the Defendant’s 112 report that he hangs the fat at the restaurant; and (b) saw the Defendant’s slope F of the Seoul Mapo Police Station E zone called “I am in connection with the fat, I am in the fat; (c) am in the fat with the fat; and (d) am in the fat with the f at the fat; and (d) am in the said fat with the f at the fat; and (d) am in the said f’s fat with the f at the fat; and (d) am in the said fat with the f at the fat; and (e) am in the said G’s fat with the f’s fat; and (e) am in the said F’s fat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each police statement to F, G, H, and I;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime within the period of a repeated crime of this case, and the content of the instant crime, etc., the Defendant’s liability for the crime is not minor.

On the other hand, there is a reason to take into account the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case by chance while working.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account such circumstances and reasons, criminal records of the defendant, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings of this case.