2. In full view of the elements of unfavorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s deception of the owner of the business and the number of escapes is not more than four times and the damage recovery is not performed, and the amount actually acquired by the Defendant is 8.2 million and the amount actually acquired is 8.2 million and the factors of favorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime at the time of the crime of this case, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the scope of recommended sentence of sentencing guidelines (one to one year and six months), it cannot be deemed that the lower

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.