beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.24 2015고단6942

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 28, 2015, around January 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid off a approximately 0.2g of the Mexacule, a local mental medicine, from D, in the street around the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) around 0.2g of the Mexacule, a local mental medicine, from D; and (c) provided D with a price of KRW 1.50,000 in return.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he traded a philophone, which is a local mental medicine.

2. On January 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 21:00 on January 29, 2015, 2015, contained about 0.05 grams in the F tea located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, in three of the philophones, added one of them into the Defendant’s arms, injected one of them into the Defendant’s arms, injected one of them into the G arms, and injected one of the others with the dilution in the remainder. < Amended by Act No. 13350, Jan. 29, 2015>

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered and provided a penphone, which is a local mental medicine.

3. On April 12, 2015, the Defendant, around April 12, 2015, 201: (a) 21:00, around the Defendant’s house (hereinafter “Defendant”); (b) 3.20,000 won in consideration of the following: (c) 1/35g of philopon from I on the street near the Defendant’s house; and (d) 1/320,000 won in consideration of the fact.

At around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant continued to put approximately 0.05 grams in the house of G located in 22:0, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 301, into three philopon, and dilution, one of them was injected into the Defendant’s arms, and the remaining two were injected into H and G arms, respectively.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he traded a philophone, which is a local mental medicine, and administered and provided them.

4. On June 29, 2015, the Defendant provided a coffee with approximately 0.05 grams from the Defendant’s house as indicated in paragraph (1) around June 23, 2015 to H, which was dilutiond.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he provided a penphone, which is a local mental medicine.

Summary of Evidence

1...