If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

On May 26, 2020, the Defendant driven a B G90 car on 01:0 BG on 01:30, and driven a four-lane in front of the D cafeteria in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-do along two-lanes from the side of the lake Park to the distance of New Seoul shopping mall, the Defendant received the left-hand part of the E driver’s FW 520D car, which changed from the three-lanes to the two-lanes, as the right-hand part of the G90 car.

The Defendant, due to driving of a vehicle, destroyed the said BMW 520D car to be repaired in KRW 8,354,180, and left the scene without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographers and CCTV video CDs related to the accident investigation report on the actual condition of traffic accident;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires that the defendant should repent his/her mistake and not repeat his/her offense.

The main reason for the occurrence of traffic accidents stated in the facts constituting the crime is E.

E expressed his wish not to punish the Defendant.

There is no record of criminal punishment for the defendant within the last seven years.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background leading to the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.